Overview of Data Storage at Fred Hutch

Updated: November 18, 2020

Edit this Page via GitHub       Comment by Filing an Issue      Have Questions? Ask them here.

The Hutch supports a number of options for storing your data such as database, file, scratch, object and collaborative storage options. The storage you use to store your data will depend on the nature of the data and your anticipated use. Below is an overview of what data storage resources are available. For more detailed information, including setup instructions and limitations, please see the links and articles in the sidebar.

Data Storage Guidance

Most Fred Hutch based researchers using large scale biomedical data sets initially store their data using Fast storage alongside their smaller scale laboratory data. This provides direct, rapid access to files both manually (e.g., via mapping a drive to a workstation) and to local computing resources (via our HPC cluster, see below). However, a strategy for where, when and for how long to store what size data is important to create to ensure that data access by researcher or compute resource, transfer and archiving are not unnecessarily complicated thus hindering the research process.

Depending on the type of data used by a research group, different combinations of data storage options may be appropriate. Assessing the strengths, mode of access, and interactivity with computing resources of each of these types of data storage options alongside an assessment of the types of data a research group use and the type of interactions with those data is becoming more important for researchers. This assessment also is becoming more important to repeat over time as data storage and connectivity infrastructure changes and as the particular data types and interactions of research groups evolve.

Storing protected health information (PHI) data

Please check with your supervisor before you store any PHI data on Fred Hutch systems as your data set may have compliance requirements that would not allow you to store the data on any of the existing systems. In almost all cases you should be working with de-identified data which can be stored on any of the above storage systems. If you must store PHI data, you may only use systems that are approved by ISO and support:

  1. Encryption at rest (e.g. on the hard drive)
  2. Encryption in transit (e.g. through the network)
  3. Access auditing (a systems log who accessed a file what time).

This is an overview of supported features:

Feature Secure File Fast File Economy File OneDrive
Encryption at Rest - X X X
Encryption in Transit X *) X *) X X
Access auditing X - X X
Approved for PHI by ISO Yes No **) Yes Yes

*) Only Windows 10 and latest Mac, not NFS/HPC/Linux **) Please contact ISO

The Fred Hutch IRB’s information on HIPAA compliance can be found at the linked CenterNet pages.

Storage Allocation and Costs

Storage Resource Costs (per TB/month)* Backup Location/Duration Best Use
Home Free to 100GB limit 7 days of Snapshots, Daily backups, Off Site copy Only use this location for software and settings specific to a user, not for data, not shared to others. HARD LIMIT, cannot be expanded
Fast $$$ beyond 1TB per PI 7 days of Snapshots, Daily backups, Off Site copy Large instrument files and data sets that need high performance access to computing resources, Unix file permissions, but not temporary data (such as intermediate files)
Economy Local and Cloud $ beyond 100TB per PI Multi-datacenter replication, 90 day undelete (Trashcan) with request to helpdesk Best for archiving large data sets, or primary storage of large files. Good for PHI or other data that requires encryption and auditing. Requires Desktop Client to access, see Object Storage page.
Scratch Free Not applicable Temporary files, such as those intermediate to a final result that only need to persist during a job. Appropriate use can significantly reduce data storage costs, see our Scratch Storage page.

Additional details for other CIT file services such as Secure File (aka J or R drive) features are available on Centernet. For expenses charged to your group for data storage in these systems, please see the storage usage dashboard. If you are interested in a breakdown of your storage ulitization by folder you can get these details at Storage HotSpots. Please select your PI as owner. You can also export all data as CSV. (Please note: for performance reasons only folders > 1GB without subfolders are shown here) . For pricing information please check this page on CenterNet.

Data Locations for Fred Hutch Shared Resource-Generated Data

For data made by Fred Hutch researchers via the Genomics Shared Resource, the default data deposition is currently managed directly by Genomics, and will result in the data being made available to the researchers via their Fast storage ( e.g., at path /fh/fast/lastname_f/SR/ngs for sequencing data). Other types of datasets are transferred to researchers in either a dnaarray directory or via other forms of transfer specific to the platform type or data source. This allows for rapid access to recently generated datasets. However, once data generated via the Genomics Core becomes of primary interest to archive for occasional use, it is a good idea to consider implementing the active data management scheme described above with the assistance of Scientific Computing.

For example, depending on the intended use of the datasets, it may be desirable once data is generated by the Genomics Shared Resource to archive the data to the researcher’s Economy Local storage space, with a copy put in Scratch or Economy Cloud for immediate processing. The specific organization of archive and working copies of data will depend on the particular project involved.

  • For consulting about how to handle large amounts of externally or internally generated data email scicomp.
  • For additional assistance regarding data generated via the Fred Hutch Genomics Shared Resource, email bioinformatics.

Data Storage Types

Database Storage Systems: REDCap, SQL and DB4Sci

There are several options available at the Fred Hutch for storing data in a database system. These supported systems span a wide range of services to meet the various needs of Fred Hutch researchers. These include REDCap (supported by Collaborative Data Services based in PHS), MSSQL Server (supported by CIT Enterprise Application Services) and DB4Sci (aka MyDB, supported by SciComp, and provides access to four database engine types including Postgres, MariaDB (MySQL), MongoDB, and Neo4j).

File Storage: Storage in Home, Fast, Secure

File storage keeps your data on disks and allows access to your data using familiar tools you’re used to: Unix commands like cat, cp, ls, and rm, browser tools like Windows Explorer or OSX’s Finder (to browse drives mapped to your local workstation), and most common Bioinformatic tools. These storage systems are similar to the hard drive on your computer, just typically larger and faster.

Economy Storage: Object Storage

Object storage systems scale better in capacity and performance and are much cheaper to operate than traditional file storage systems. Cloud computing depends very much on object storage systems such as Amazon’s AWS S3. There are a number of features and benefits of object storage systems, such as better sharing of data and much better handling of meta data (e.g. annotations). At Fred Hutch we use object storage predominantly for very large files (e.g. BAM files) and for archiving purposes.

Temporary Storage: Scratch

The scratch file system is a file storage system that works differently than the systems intended for long term data storage. It is maintained by SciComp for temporary storage of research data during active analysis. This is a large, high-performance storage system. It is not designed to be as available or as robust as the home or fast file systems (these features were traded for lower cost and greater volume)- that said, it has shown itself to be quite reliable and reasonably fault tolerant.

Collaborative Storage Options

These storage systems have capabilities allowing you to share data with people outside the Hutch, with or without a HutchNet ID. These include Aspera and OneDrive.

Data Transfer


To facilitate the transfer of data between Fred Hutch storage locations, a new tool has been developed and is being piloted at the Hutch called Motuz. You can find some basic how-to guidance to get started with Motuz in our Resource Library

Updated: November 18, 2020

Edit this Page via GitHub       Comment by Filing an Issue      Have Questions? Ask them here.